A movement calling itself Mary-is-God-Catholic Movement poisons the internet. One
Dominic Sanchez Falar of Cebu City, Philippines, promotes the
idea that “Mary is God - Mary is the soul of the Holy Spirit,”
and prompts people to join in an effort to proclaim the “true
message of Our Blessed Mother at Fatima better known as the
Third Secret of Our Lady of Fatima.”
The movement pursues three
objectives:
1. To declare Mary
as God, soul of the Holy Spirit, and Co-Creator with God.
2. To attack the
Church for “malevolently concocting its own version of the Third
Secret of Fatima” thereby withholding its true content which –
how convenient! – allegedly states that “Mary is God.” The
movement accuses the Vatican generically of leading an “Anti-Fatima Campaign.”
3. To attack Pope
Benedict XVI accusing him personally of misleading Fatima
Devotees and putting “an end to popular belief that the Third
Secret of Fatima concerns the Dogma of Faith (which dogma?) of
the Holy Catholic Church.”
This movement is a typical
example of how heresy develops and thrives.
1. We have a proposition
of faith which blatantly contradicts the Church’s ongoing and
most authoritative teaching: Mary is not God. She is a creature
of God and a human being. She is neither Co-Creator with God nor
soul of the Holy Spirit.
The Dogmatic Constitution on
the Church Lumen Gentium (LG) states:
Because of this gift of
sublime grace she far surpasses all creatures, both in heaven
and on earth. At the same time, however, because she belongs to
the offspring of Adam she is one with all those who are to be
saved.
LG 53. See also LG 56, 59,
This most Holy Synod …
exhorts theologians and preachers of the divine word to abstain
zealously both from all gross exaggerations as well as from
petty narrow-mindedness in considering the singular dignity of
the Mother of God.(23*) Following the study of Sacred Scripture,
the Holy Fathers, the doctors and liturgy of the Church, and
under the guidance of the Church's magisterium, let them rightly
illustrate the duties and privileges of the Blessed Virgin which
always look to Christ, the source of all truth, sanctity and
piety. Let them assiduously keep away from whatever, either by
word or deed, could lead separated brethren or any other into
error regarding the true doctrine of the Church. Let the
faithful remember moreover that true devotion consists neither
in sterile or transitory affection, nor in a certain vain
credulity, but proceeds from true faith, by which we are led to
know the excellence of the Mother of God, and we are moved to a
filial love toward our mother and to the imitation of her
virtues. LG 67
2. To lend authority and
credibility to this heretical proposition, the movement refers
to personal revelation from God, the highest and most
unverifiable of all sources of knowledge and authority.
The Catechism of the
Catholic Church, article 67 states:
Throughout the ages, there have
been so-called "private" revelations, some of which have been
recognized by the authority of the Church. They do not belong,
however, to the deposit of faith. It is not their role to
improve or complete Christ's definitive Revelation, but to help
live more fully by it in a certain period of history. Guided by
the Magisterium of the Church, the sensus fidelium knows how to
discern and welcome in these revelations whatever constitutes an
authentic call of Christ or his saints to the Church."
"Christian faith cannot accept
"revelations" that claim to surpass or correct the Revelation of
which Christ is the fulfillment, as is the case in certain non
Christian religions and also in certain recent sects which base
themselves on such "revelations."
3. The claim to personal
revelation of one individual, Dominic Sanchez Falar, is further
packed into an even more authoritative, widely popular and in
any case better known event of divine communication, the Marian
apparitions in Fatima.
4. But how could and
would Fatima vouch for the declaration that Mary is God? There
is, of course, this famous Third Secret, a longtime topic of
manifold interpretations and wild speculations. Although
unveiled and commented upon by the official Church in 2000, the
movement for “Mary-is-God” denies this, and proclaims that the
Church’s “final dogma” (Mary is God) remains undisclosed because
“faithless church officials preferred to contradict it in favor
of earthly concerns.”
The Third Part of
the “Secret”
“J.M.J.
The third part of
the secret revealed at the Cova da Iria-Fatima, on July
13, 1917.
I write in
obedience to you, my God, who command me to do so through his
Excellency the Bishop of Leiria and through your Most Holy
Mother and mine.
After the two
parts which I have already explained, at the left of Our Lady
and a little above, we saw an Angel with a flaming sword in his
left hand; flashing, it gave out flames that looked as though
they would set the world on fire; but they died out in contact
with the splendor that Our Lady radiated towards him from her
right hand: pointing to the earth with his right hand, the Angel
cried out in a loud voice: ‘Penance, Penance, Penance!'. And we saw in an immense light that is God:
‘something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they
pass in front of it' a Bishop dressed in White ‘we had the
impression that it was the Holy Father'. Other Bishops, Priests,
men and women Religious going up a steep mountain, at the top of
which there was a big Cross of rough-hewn trunks as of a
cork-tree with the bark; before reaching there the Holy Father
passed through a big city half in ruins and half trembling with
halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the
souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top
of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he
was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows
at him, and in the same way there died one after another the
other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay
people of different ranks and positions. Beneath the two arms of
the Cross there were two Angels each with a crystal aspersorium
in his hand, in which they gathered up the blood of the Martyrs
and with it sprinkled the souls that were making their way to
God.
Tuy-3-1-1944.” |
5. Secrets, immediate divine interpretation and
legitimization, as well as conspiracy are the typical
ingredients of heresies. Add to this the claim of orthodoxy,
namely the orthodoxy of the promoters of the final truth about
Mary – she is God! – who call themselves “faithful Catholics
devoting our lives to the Proclamation of the true Message of
Our Blessed Mother at Fatima.” It goes without saying that if
orthodoxy is the apanage of the Mary-is-God Catholic Movement,
then it cannot exist where the official Church is concerned.
This is the point where demonization begins. Benedict XVI is
–“not known to many Catholics’!- Our Lady of Fatima’s “greatest
adversary.” He “concocted blatant lies and misinterpretation”
on behalf of the Third Secret. He insinuated “that the seers of
Fatima were just hallucinating.” He was the “mastermind of John
Paul II ’s cover up of the Third Secret of Fatima.” What about
Sister Lucia? Not only did the Vatican “order her silence;” she
was incarcerated. The attack against Benedict XVI escalates with
these questions: “Why is he against Fatima? Is not one who is
anti-Mary also anti-Christ?”
Joseph Cardinal
Ratzinger, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith:
Theological Commentary on the Third Secret
The criterion for
the truth and value of a private revelation is therefore its
orientation to Christ himself. When it leads us away from him,
when it becomes independent of him or even presents itself as
another and better plan of salvation, more important than the
Gospel, then it certainly does not come from the Holy Spirit,
who guides us more deeply into the Gospel and not away from it. The
interpretation [of the Third Secret] belonged not to the
visionary but to the Church. After reading the text, however,
she said that this interpretation corresponded to what she had
experienced and that on her part she thought the interpretation
correct. And so we come to
the final question: What is the meaning of the “secret” of
Fatima as a whole (in its three parts)? What does it say to us?
First of all, we must affirm with Cardinal Sodano: “... the
events to which the third part of the ‘secret' of Fatima refers
now seem part of the past.” Insofar as individual events are
described, they belong to the past. Those who expected exciting
apocalyptic revelations about the end of the world or the future
course of history are bound to be disappointed. Fatima does not
satisfy our curiosity in this way, just as Christian faith in
general cannot be reduced to an object of mere curiosity. What
remains was already evident when we began our reflections on the
text of the “secret”: the exhortation to prayer as the path of
“salvation for souls” and, likewise, the summons to penance and
conversion.
I would like
finally to mention another key expression of the “secret” which
has become justly famous: “my Immaculate Heart will triumph.”
What does this mean? The Heart open to God, purified by
contemplation of God, is stronger than guns and weapons of every
kind. The fiat of Mary, the word of her heart, has changed the
history of the world, because it brought the Savior into the
world—because, thanks to her Yes, God could become man in our
world and remains so for all time. The Evil One has power in
this world, as we see and experience continually; he has power
because our freedom continually lets itself be led away from
God. But since God himself took a human heart and has thus
steered human freedom towards what is good, the freedom to
choose evil no longer has the last word. From that time forth,
the word that prevails is this: “In the world you will have
tribulation, but take heart; I have overcome the world.”(Jn
16:33) The message of Fatima invites us to trust in this
promise.
IN CONCLUSION:
Blatant as
it may be, the message
of the Mary-is-God-Movement is a dangerous ideological
concoction. It takes advantage of the people’s genuine love for
Mary, exploits a widespread craving for the supernatural and
religious sensationalism, and entices our natural penchant for Da Vinci-type fabrications. Mixed into the blend are some
anti-Roman sentiments and the not-so-faint echoes of a still
fashionable Goddess-talk.
by Fr. Johann G. Roten,
S.M
|