How to Deal with Apparitions
Receptiveness and caution
Be cautious believing in apparitions, in
general and by principle.
• This means: A critical assessment of particular events is needed
• We should gratefully recognize
God’s freedom to speak and manifest Himself as He pleases,
how and when He pleases.
We should never forget that Christianity is based on
• Epiphany (manifestation of God): the partial and
visual disclosure of the Trinity in Jesus Christ, the Spirit and the Church
• God’s own initiative:
Apparitions can be an expression of God’s free and loving
decision to make Himself visible to us in a mediated way, as for
example in Mary.
Freedom to believe and spiritual
riches
We do not have to believe in
apparitions. They do not have a binding character, not even
those recognized by the Church. Why is that so?
• Apparitions are not a part
of God’s self-revelation to the whole people of God as we
find it in Jesus Christ or in Sacred Scripture.
• Apparitions are private revelations: a personal
message, received and communicated in a personal way.
Apparitions recognized by the Church, especially, offer support
and encouragement for our spiritual life. We need all the friends
(of God) we can get: Why not take advantage of the spiritual
capital contained in messages, signs, and examples of prayer
and personal conversion?
What Are Important
Aspects of
an Apparition?
Let us examine the common characteristics of a known and recognized
apparition, that of Guadalupe (Mexico) which took place from December
9-12, 1531. Guadalupe is considered the first apparition of modern
times. It is also one of the first Marian apparitions which occasioned
the foundation of a sanctuary of permanent influence, national and
worldwide.
Read the following short description of the event and note the
italicized expressions.
On Saturday, December 9, 1531, according the the received tradition,
the Virgin Mary appeared to Juan Diego, a recently converted
Indian, on the hill of Tepeyac, where the Indians venerated
the goddess Tonantzin. Mary spoke the Nahatl language (as she
later spoke the Patois dialect of Bernadette); she sent Juan Diego to
ask the bishop of Mexico to erect a sanctuary at the foot of this
hill. The Indian went to Topetlac, the colonizing city where the
bishop and the government of the Conquistadores were located. Juan
de Zumarraga, the founder of the diocese, a Franciscan, named but not
yet consecrated, avoided the request of the little man whom
even the servants disdained. However, after the fourth apparition,
on December 15, the Virgin gave signs. After the cure of the
uncle of the visionary, she sent the Indian to carry to the bishop a bouquet of flowers from this barren site of Tepeyac. He carried
them in his tilma (a mantle woven from the fibers of maguey) and placed
them before the prelate. At this point, according to the tradition,
there appeared in the interior of the mantle the image of the Virgin
miraculously produced, the same that is venerated today in the sanctuary.
The following aspects are important:
The historical context
• Time of Spanish colonization (opposition: Indians-Spaniards; church part of colonizing
power)
• Hill of Tepeyac (formerly devoted to
goddess Tonantzin)
The apparition (Mary) identifies
• Virgin Mary calls herself as mother
of the true God from whom all life comes
• Speaks Nahatle (local dialect)
• Gives a message
• Gives signs
• Reproduction of the Virgin’s image on
the tilma
The seer/visionary
• Recently converted Indian (fifty - seven years
old)
• Little man, whom the servants disdain
• Confrontation with Spanish authority
(Church)
• Carries a message and tangible proof
The message
• Reference to the true God:
God of Life
• To erect a sanctuary at the
foot of this hill
The signs
• Cure of the uncle of the
visionary
• Roses from the barren site
of Tepeyac
• Tilma bears the image of
Mary
The number of apparitions
December 9-12, 1531 (five apparitions)
The reactions
• Initial opposition,
subsequent controversy, and finally recognition
• Foundation of sanctuary of
permanent influence
General characteristics
• Importance of the historical and sociological context:
There often exists a certain correlation
between Marian apparitions and specific historical situations (1870,
1917, 1932-33) or special human needs (material and/or religious).
The "apparition" (meaning Mary) is
perceived in categories of beauty (light, ethereal qualities,
splendor), difficult to describe. Little by little the typical image
of a given apparition is developed by painters–thanks to the
description of the visionaries.
Frequently, Mary gives a description or
self-definition of herself:
– Guadalupe: Mother of the true God from whom all
life comes.
– Lourdes: Immaculate Conception
– La Salette: Our Lady of Sorrows
– Fatima: Our Lady of the Rosary
Why does Mary appear?
Mary is the "ultimate
facilitator" in the service of the one mediator. This is illustrated in her
apparition to Gregory the Wonderworker (270/275) as reported by Gregory of
Nyssa (PG 10, 984-988). Mary is teacher of the Church: she expounds the
mystery of faith.
The visionaries of the so-called
classical apparitions (1830-1933) are mostly young and poor:
– Miraculous Medal: Catherine Labouré, 24
– La Salette: Maximin Giraud, 11 and Mélanie
Calvet, 15
– Lourdes: Bernadette Soubirious, 14
– Pontmain: Joseph Barbedette, 10, Eugène
Barbedette, 12, Françoise Richer, 11 and Jeanne-Marie Lebossé, 9
The profile of visionaries in more recent apparitions
is more diversified. Varying from case to case, the visionaries are
children, adolescents and adults, men and women, single and married. It is a scriptural fact that God speaks with
preference to the little and poor, meaning those who readily accept his word
and do not oppose it. A visionary is not infallible. His/her perception may
be limited or partially erroneous.
In general, messages have a dual function:
– The permanent function: The permanent function is to reawaken faith and to bring about a
return to God, to prayer and to fasting. It is a return to the
introductory chapters of the gospel, to the preaching of John the
Baptist for conversion and the baptism of repentance.These messages are repetitive. There are those who have
criticized their banality; but this is normal–they have an
educational function and education always requires repetition.
– The prophetic impact: Other messages are marked in varying degrees by their prophetic
impact. In 1531 Our Lady of Guadalupe reminded the conquering
Spaniards that in the eyes of God an Indian is equal to a Spaniard
and can take messages from heaven to the bishop. Rue du Bac reminded a desolate world of the closeness of heaven;
it was a world which the French Revolution had dechristianized. There are new aspects in today’s messages. The prophetic
impact of the messages associated with recent apparitions is new
when compared to Rue du Bac, La Salette, Lourdes, etc. They
underline evangelization (most explicitly at Cuapa, Kibeho, and
Damascus) and ecumenism (Zeitoun, Egypt) and remind us of the
Frequently, apparitions are accompanied by signs:
– the
rose miracle of Guadalupe
– the wellspring at Lourdes
– the
miracle of the sun in Fatima
Signs are not an integral part of the
apparition, and thus not indispensable. They are not included in the
potential recognition of an apparition. Concerning the miracle of
the sun at Fatima: No observatory knew anything about it, and the
canonical judgement of the bishop was silent on this point. Signs, however, have a corroborating function. Healings and/or
extraordinary natural phenomena help to overcome skepticism and
hesitation. Signs should not obstruct the understanding of the
deeper meaning of apparitions.
The number of apparitions within the same event (for
example, Lourdes) can vary greatly, ranging from a single apparition
at the Rue du bac (1830) to daily apparitions for fourteen years in Medjugorje.
Some examples:
– Pontmain, 1
– Fatima, 6
– Beauraing, 33
– Banneux, 8
The reactions to an
alleged apparitions must be assessed on two levels;
– The level of devotional expression:
the reaction of the faithful, their curiosity and piety, makes
an apparition known. It is very often the spontaneous occasion
for devotional expression (prayer, conversion, healing), and may
lead to an official recognition of this devotional expression.
– The recognition of the event is
much slower to come and lies in the hands of the ecclesiastical
authority.
Meaning of Approval or
Recognition of
Apparitions
Two phases:
– recognition of devotional expression, habitually at the site
of the apparitions
– recognition of the event (with alleged supernatural character)
Careful and negative wording
taking into account the following methodology:
– Absence of elements opposing or contradicting faith and/or
morals
– Absence of elements which could prevent the publication of
events and the authorization of a public cult
– Determining whether there are sufficient arguments of
natural/rational order (as for any other historical event), so
that the possibility/probability of a supernatural causality
(meaning supernatural intervention or manifestation) can be
reasonably assumed and accepted in faith.
Important distinctions:
– Approval of devotion does not include the recognition of the
apparition as such.
– Even in its approval of the apparition, the Church does not
intend to give an infallible guarantee as to the supernatural
origin of the apparition.
Criteria to Assess Authenticity
– Sufficiency of information (for
example, Grouchero, Ukraine)
– Orthodoxy (conformity with faith
and morals)
– Transparency (do apparitions
lead us to God, Jesus Christ, the gospel, to the service of God
and humanity, and to the promotion of faith?)
– Serious reasons for believing in
the presence of the hand of God manifested by cures, conversions
and other miracles
– Expert opinion (various disciplines,
especially doctors and psychiatrists)
–
Do these apparitions bear good fruit?
–
Is the Church authority favorable or
unfavorable?
The deeper meaning of
apparitions for our spiritual life
Apparitions are neither the classical
ways to God’s self-communication nor even remotely the most
important ones. Any sacrament of the Church is an infinitely safer
conductor of the supernatural than apparitions.Nonetheless, apparitions
remind us that Christianity is a religious tradition based on mediation
always. God is not immediately present, but He gives himself to
be shared. He entrusts Himself or His message to Mary, who in turn
entrusts this same message to the visionary who passes it on to
a multitude of people, mostly pilgrims. These again share the message
with others.This is the very anatomy of revelation, not just
the ephemeral strategy of an apparition.The following conclusions
can be drawn:
Through apparitions God challenges us immediately, in a direct and
head-on way, not through a book passed down through the centuries
or in and through liturgical routine.God remains the visible and
invisible God, entrusting Himself to Mary and the visionaries.His
message is thus confided to fragile carriers:Its communication is
based on receiving, assimilating, passing onIt is and remains a
gift to the community of His believers and friends.
Incarnation and eschatology, meaning that we live
in the presence of the eternal but with both our feet on the ground,
looks and sounds like "mission impossible." Again, apparitions can help
to achieve a living synthesis between the incarnational and the
eschatological dimensions of our life. Visionaries are such living
syntheses. Not so much by virtue of their personal spiritual merits, but
because they are embodying – simultaneously this child or
housewife or factory worker and this privileged human
being touched visibly by an extraordinary grace of God.That is the reason why–where incarnation and
eschatology come together–apparitions can and should teach us a deeper
understanding of mystery, that is to say the intimate relation
between the visible and the invisible, the natural and the supernatural,
God’s presence and transcendence; especially and essentially mystery
means the experience of his ever greater love for us.
by Fr. Johann G. Roten
|